When returning from holiday, one starts to think of holidays
By 'south of the Rio Grande', I mean 'into Mexico' rather than 'anywhere south of 31N' - I thought this was standard usage, but various of my friends in Cambridge interpreted it the other way.
[Poll #1545665]
[Poll #1545665]
no subject
no subject
Are there any routes that transiently cross the Antarctic circle? JNB to SCL still seems to be across the southern Atlantic.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
test flights only
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm pretty well-traveled for an American, anyway. Haven't been to South America or the Far East, or Antarctica.
Keeping track of the exact European countries I've visited is even harder than keeping track of the states, since it's all long ago (1967 and earlier, except for England).
no subject
(PNG but not Indonesia because there's a massive sea trench between them, whereas the Torres Strait is so shallow that there used to be an Oz-PNG land bridge.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I would very much like to go to Hawaii, Easter Island and the Galapagos, but I'm not quite sure which I'd count them as :-).
I answered yes to well-travelled, even though what I think is truer is "I spend a lot of time and money on nice holidays abroad and, indeed, am famed amongst some of my friends for this habit :-)". I don't go as often as you do, and I'm fairly conservative in where I do go.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Aren't nice holidays abroad pretty much what time and money are for ?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I have been "only" to France, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and Egypt (which brief transits through Belgium). Three of those only with my parents rather than once of an age to be picking my own holidays.
Even as much as 50 years ago I would probably have counted as reasonably well travelled, but these days it's much less than the norm (for Brits, anyway).
no subject
I have reservations about the use of "well-travelled" as an exact synonym for "widely-travelled". (Noting that I claim to be neither.) I don't have neat definitions for how I perceive the two, and I do tend to believe there's a positive correlation between the two, but width for width's sake is not necessarily something I would care to associate with any form of the word "good".
...he wrote, jealously.
no subject
no subject
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_circle
(no subject)
no subject
I can't count passport stamps, though; I haven't had my passport stamped on EU entry in over a decade (since I picked up Irish citizenship) and my US passport is only sometimes stamped when I re-enter the US.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Never been to Antarctica, but I have shared an office with someone who went on to overwinter there more than once, and know/work with a few people who've been to the South Pole to do solar observations.
Edit: and Romania wasn't quite in the EU when I went there in 2006, so I didn't count it.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
[1] where they found a stick in Antarctica is a more interesting question
(no subject)
Seals
no subject
Definitively visited: Ireland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Luxembourg, Greece. Stopped long enough in Austria for a photograph. Waited around in a train station in Belgium, but calling that a "visit" is a bit dubious. I didn't count Wales and Scotland, they are countries and certainly in the EU but I guessed that you meant "member states". I didn't count the UK.
The only non-EU country I've visited is Switzerland.
no subject
Those who've been to Aus or NZ tend to have stopped in interesting places on the way, even if they haven't visited them otherwise, which I think is terribly unfair :)
no subject
no subject
And I'm not sure how many EU countries I can count—two for real, and two where I never left the airport—but your poll is so constructed that both numbers lead to the same answer.
no subject
no subject