By 'south of the Rio Grande', I mean 'into Mexico' rather than 'anywhere south of 31N' - I thought this was standard usage, but various of my friends in Cambridge interpreted it the other way.
why is the antarctic only imporant if you've visited at least four other continents? What's wrong with Three+Antarctic? (not that I have, but just the questions seemed unbalanced!)
The Antarctic's generally not the first place anyone goes, and unless you live in South America (and I don't think I have any South American-resident readers, though I know khalinche goes there a lot) you're going there via South America. So I'd be really very surprised if anyone filled in 2+Antarctic or 3+Antarctic, and I thought the distinction between 'all six non-antarctic' and 'six including Antarctica' was worth making.
True, I hadn't thought about the South America stopoff ... I know several of my friends who have gone penguin spotting and/or on a cruise that included the antarctic, and I wouldn't be too surprised to find that some of them might have just done The Americas (north and south) and the Antarctic, though I suspect if they've done that, they've probably done the Far East once and probably Europe for a worldcon or a "if it's Tuesday it must be Zagreb" tour.
I'm South American-resident (though not permanently). I'd probably have gone to Antarctica (and thus be a 2+Antarctic) if the tourist boats weren't so ridiculously expensive.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 04:02 pm (UTC)