I know why the older proteins described in the PDB file format end each line with the PDB code of the compound and the number of the line in the file.
It's so, at the dawn of time when you carried around protein structures in boxes of punched cards, you could sort on the field at the end of the line and get the cards back into order if you dropped the box.
It's so, at the dawn of time when you carried around protein structures in boxes of punched cards, you could sort on the field at the end of the line and get the cards back into order if you dropped the box.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-15 05:03 pm (UTC)How many...
Date: 2006-12-15 05:31 pm (UTC)Re: How many...
Date: 2006-12-15 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-15 08:19 pm (UTC)When loading a 3000-card source program into the card reader hopper, the chance of dropping a handful at least is non-trivial.
Dropping a box (2000 cards) could very easily pop the lid and spill the cards out. A *stack* of boxes dropped together made that even more likely. It could be a real mess.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-16 03:33 pm (UTC)There was a similar format for diffraction datasets - 3 sets of hklI (3I3,F10.6 I think)), then structure code and sequence number, but by the time I started doing crystallography, even the older of our two machines (the 3-circle with the wall-spanning PDP-8, not the cute 4-circle with the rackmounted PDP-11) had paper tape, so sequence numbers were already becoming redundant.
Of course, if I were to tell you my first structure was done with a Weissenberg camera, optical estimation of spot density, and Beevers-Lipson strips to calculate structure factors with, you'd probably think I was a lot older than I am.... But it did make a very nice basic undergrad practical (ammonium oxalate has a nice simple structure, is both monoclinic and centrosymmetric, so no weird special positions, and has a flat enough unit cell you can treat it as 2-d, so you only need a 0-layer Weissenberg.