I think, in the context of that election, "disenfranchised" is applicable, but I'd only go around saying disenfranchised without further context if the election was sufficiently important -- where that's a fuzzy boundary.
Also, it's just me, but if the prevention of voting is truly random and fairly small, I might not say "disenfranchised" if that means I don't feel my view is underrepresented.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-09 04:40 pm (UTC)Also, it's just me, but if the prevention of voting is truly random and fairly small, I might not say "disenfranchised" if that means I don't feel my view is underrepresented.