I think I would use some other phrasing if the rules said I didn't have a vote but I felt that I *ought* to have a vote.
I think there's a spectrum here. If I felt I ought to have a vote, but I never had before and I'm aware the argument is controversial, I might not say that. But if the law says "general election open to everyone except women", I thought disenfranchised is EXACTLY the term, even more so than if that effect is indirect.
AFAIK the suffragettes used the word 'disenfranchised' of themselves so I think there's sound precedent for it meaning "the rules deny me a vote but the rules are wrong".
Oh yes, definitely, I think most people get the idea that women were excluded from elections and many people thought that was wrong, even if they themselves disagreed. But I think there's some sort of sense of being specifically excluded -- eg. if I lived in a dictatorship, I might think I was morally disenfranchised because there should be elections but aren't, but I probably wouldn't put it like that.
Ah, yes, I think you're right, there's a difference in kind between an election you can't take part in and an election that doesn't exist at all. How about (i) an election that's so comprehensively rigged that there's no relationship between real votes and outcome or (ii) an unrigged election with rules so bizarre that we can agree that it's not democratic even within the permitted voters? i.e. does 'disenfranchised' require actual democracy or just an election?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2015-09-09 04:36 pm (UTC)I think I would use some other phrasing if the rules said I didn't have a vote but I felt that I *ought* to have a vote.
I think there's a spectrum here. If I felt I ought to have a vote, but I never had before and I'm aware the argument is controversial, I might not say that. But if the law says "general election open to everyone except women", I thought disenfranchised is EXACTLY the term, even more so than if that effect is indirect.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 06:51 pm (UTC)How about (i) an election that's so comprehensively rigged that there's no relationship between real votes and outcome or (ii) an unrigged election with rules so bizarre that we can agree that it's not democratic even within the permitted voters? i.e. does 'disenfranchised' require actual democracy or just an election?