Why David Attenborough's people buy the expensive lenses
(click and it gets bigger, but sadly in two cases no sharper; this is with the smallest and cheapest readily available large expensive lens, a second-hand Sigma 70-200/2.8 with 2x teleconverter. Picture 2 isn't too fuzzy, though f/11 isn't really enough for dimly-lit lions far away)
Also, in honour of Galileo:
no subject
(i may get another one if i find a decent one at a favourable price...)
no subject
i could say that i had a lot of difficulty focussing the neg (i didn't have a focus aid) but as they say... a poor workman... etc...
;)
no subject
This is obviously how people develop the desire for a telescope, ideally with camera mount and motorised tracking :-)
no subject
Motorised tracking isn't a problem for the Moon and Jupiter, they're hundredth-of-a-second exposures anyway.
I borrowed a nice telescope from