![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sh: neither as fast as sloths nor as elegant as hagfish
I have a directory with 244 files with names like m12331246123468911531238951802368109467.mlog, which I want to rename to names like C038.123312.mlog
time for u in m*mlog; do B=$(echo $u | cut -dm -f2 | cut -d. -f1); echo $u C${#B}.$(echo $B | cut -c1-6).mlog; done
takes 17 seconds
time for u in m*mlog; do B=$(echo $u | cut -dm -f2 | cut -d. -f1); echo $u C${#B}.${B:0:6}.mlog; done
takes eight seconds
time for u in m*mlog; do B=${u:1}; B=${B%.mlog}; echo $u C${#B}.${B:0:6}.mlog; done
takes 0.2 seconds.
Of course, when I replace 'echo' with 'mv' it still takes fourteen seconds, but I am not that shocked that mv over NFS might be slow.
Which suggests that doing $() to start a new shell is taking something like a hundredth of a second on a one-year-old PC. I didn't know that. On the other hand, if I start writing code this dense in unclear bashisms, my colleagues at work will disembowel me with spoons.
PS: if I stop running a CPU-intensive program on each of my eight cores, starting new processes gets about fifteen times faster. I can understand if it got twice as fast, but I really don't understand fifteen.
time for u in m*mlog; do B=$(echo $u | cut -dm -f2 | cut -d. -f1); echo $u C${#B}.$(echo $B | cut -c1-6).mlog; done
takes 17 seconds
time for u in m*mlog; do B=$(echo $u | cut -dm -f2 | cut -d. -f1); echo $u C${#B}.${B:0:6}.mlog; done
takes eight seconds
time for u in m*mlog; do B=${u:1}; B=${B%.mlog}; echo $u C${#B}.${B:0:6}.mlog; done
takes 0.2 seconds.
Of course, when I replace 'echo' with 'mv' it still takes fourteen seconds, but I am not that shocked that mv over NFS might be slow.
Which suggests that doing $() to start a new shell is taking something like a hundredth of a second on a one-year-old PC. I didn't know that. On the other hand, if I start writing code this dense in unclear bashisms, my colleagues at work will disembowel me with spoons.
PS: if I stop running a CPU-intensive program on each of my eight cores, starting new processes gets about fifteen times faster. I can understand if it got twice as fast, but I really don't understand fifteen.