fivemack: (Default)
Mining companies.

I thought I just about understood mining companies. You own some unprepossessing land in Australia, or Kazakhstan, or Chile, under which are rocks made of copper. You buy incredibly expensive machines for grinding the rocks to impalpable dust and getting the copper out. You sell the copper. You pay royalties to the government whose land you own, which they invest wisely in upgrading the railway from Alice Springs to Perth.

Machines wear out on a fairly well-understood schedule; copper is needed both in things that people want, like iPods, and things that people need, like washing-machine motors. In the long term there's the risk that you might find new copper mines more slowly than you use yours up, and there's the risk (faced by mercury miners) that demand might change in secular ways; on the other hand demand might change in other ways - ALCOA used to give away lumps of gallium in the hope that someone find a use for this critical component of microwave amplifiers for mobile phones. But if you're a big miner you might well have a copper mine, an iron mine, a mercury mine which you closed in 1995 and an oil well, and a small amount of funding to a bloke in a back room at CUED perfecting the electrolytic refinement of scandium; as copper gets replaced by plastic, so money that would have gone in your copper purse ends up in your oil wallet, and as people start wanting even lighter, fuel-efficienter aircraft made with aluminium-scandium alloys, so your bloke in the back room at CUED gets to buy a big house in Cherry Hinton.

Over the last few years the shares of the big miners have gone up significantly, with the usual justification being that China has lots of people, and lots of them will want houses, in which are copper pipes and copper wiring.

China still has lots of people; it is not clear that fewer of them want houses in the middle of August than wanted houses in the middle of July. So why have the big miners usually been the reddest and most plummetting shares on the LSE when the LSE goes all red and people start watching Liverpool Street for falling bankers?
fivemack: (Default)
According to the CIA Factbook entry for Russia,

Russia imports $15.68b worth of Stuff from Ukraine
Russia exports $11b worth of Stuff to Ukraine

According to the entry for Ukraine,

Ukraine imports $6.88b worth of Stuff from Russia
Russia exports $15.54b worth of Stuff to Ukraine.

There's no possible purchasing-power-parity adjustment that makes these figures make sense; where has the four billion dollars gone?

If you mutter darkly about corruption in the East, consider

US entry says US -> Canada is $213.3b
Canada entry says US -> Canada is $187.1b
Canada entry says Canada -> US is $310.4b
US entry says Canada -> US is $293.6b

which set of entries indicate that a sum of about the GDP of Kenya annually has been statistically mislaid.

July 2017

161718 19202122


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 03:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios